Naja, mit der WIPO wollen wir uns nicht anlegen... unsere Patente sind einiges mehr wert als ein paar Musikstuecke.Kawa hat geschrieben:Auch wenn 1 Mio Nationen das ratifizieren, wenn der CH-Souverän sprich das Volk es ablehnt können uns die alle.
PS : Blöd ausgedrückt, aber so ist's! Unsere Politiker kämen dann bös ins schwitzen, alles schon versprochen aber ....
Referendum gegen die Urheberrechtsgesetzes-Änderung
Ein interessanter Post auf der Swinog zu diesem Thema:
Nach all den kritischen Äusserungen schwingt bei mir der Pendel auch langsam ein wenig um. Ist das wirklich ein Good Thing(tm)...
[quote="Tonnerre LOMBARD"]I do not mean to refuse you your right to your own opinion on this, but
I want you to be aware of the fact that there is a certain risk involved
with the referendum.
<history lesson>
Before that, you should know that despite people's claims, this law has
not been rushed past the people or anything. There has been a public
hearing on this way back in 2005, which I attended. In 2006, the relevant
gremia decided on the issue, and have been lobbied by us and quite a number
of other parties. I have personally made an analysis of the (at the time)
legal proposal, have postulated ways to improve it, and have invited people
to come and help me (which some did).
All those people who claim that there has been no public notice of this
law should simply be embarassed that they did not act in time despite the
fact that there has been a _lot_ of public uproar about it for more than
two years now, and should stop discounting our work on the issue, which
has been considerable.
See also http://www.ffii.ch/action/urg2006/
</history lesson>
Now to the problems. We have already achieved something with regard to
taming this law. The original proposal had far worse provisions, and we
could have ended up far worse without some of the specifications. However,
if the current law is abolished through a referendum, it will have to
recurr immediately, because the law was not created out of hot air but
as a response to an international treaty which Switzerland ratified.
However, chances are that next time, we will not be able to maintain the
provisions which got into the law this time, so after a referendum, in my
estimation, we will end up with a law which is way worse than it is
right now. Thus, I would rather propose to use the provisions laid down
in the law to force a new revision based on the facts which will
undoubtedly be established in its evaluation, i.e. what happens after
it has come to force.
Anyway, make up your own mind. I do not want to force anyone of you here
not to sign this proposal, and there is a chance of course that I am
entirely mistaken. What you should be aware of though is that this is
not going to be the last thing you heard from the copyright revision.
Thanks for listening and sorry for the off-topic subject, I will not
start into a flame war this time. ]
Nach all den kritischen Äusserungen schwingt bei mir der Pendel auch langsam ein wenig um. Ist das wirklich ein Good Thing(tm)...
[quote="Tonnerre LOMBARD"]I do not mean to refuse you your right to your own opinion on this, but
I want you to be aware of the fact that there is a certain risk involved
with the referendum.
<history lesson>
Before that, you should know that despite people's claims, this law has
not been rushed past the people or anything. There has been a public
hearing on this way back in 2005, which I attended. In 2006, the relevant
gremia decided on the issue, and have been lobbied by us and quite a number
of other parties. I have personally made an analysis of the (at the time)
legal proposal, have postulated ways to improve it, and have invited people
to come and help me (which some did).
All those people who claim that there has been no public notice of this
law should simply be embarassed that they did not act in time despite the
fact that there has been a _lot_ of public uproar about it for more than
two years now, and should stop discounting our work on the issue, which
has been considerable.
See also http://www.ffii.ch/action/urg2006/
</history lesson>
Now to the problems. We have already achieved something with regard to
taming this law. The original proposal had far worse provisions, and we
could have ended up far worse without some of the specifications. However,
if the current law is abolished through a referendum, it will have to
recurr immediately, because the law was not created out of hot air but
as a response to an international treaty which Switzerland ratified.
However, chances are that next time, we will not be able to maintain the
provisions which got into the law this time, so after a referendum, in my
estimation, we will end up with a law which is way worse than it is
right now. Thus, I would rather propose to use the provisions laid down
in the law to force a new revision based on the facts which will
undoubtedly be established in its evaluation, i.e. what happens after
it has come to force.
Anyway, make up your own mind. I do not want to force anyone of you here
not to sign this proposal, and there is a chance of course that I am
entirely mistaken. What you should be aware of though is that this is
not going to be the last thing you heard from the copyright revision.
Thanks for listening and sorry for the off-topic subject, I will not
start into a flame war this time. ]
Eat shit, millions of flies can't be wrong